Should we continue to add diagnostic imaging of multiple body sites

We receive requests for DI concepts for multiple procedures and body sites and have in the past rejected these as overly pre-coordinated. The decision was based on no combined procedures, no laterality etc as specified in Editorial Guidance.

 There was a decision to write up some guidance on this for the Editorial Guide. Could you as a group provide such guidance or a statement as to our policy and decsion?

Examples include:

Computed tomography angiography of aorta, abdomen, pelvis and lower limb (procedure)

Ultrasonography of abdomen and ultrasonography of pelvis with transrectal ultrasonography (procedure)

Ultrasonography of pelvis and obstetric ultrasonography with transvaginal ultrasonography (procedure)

Ultrasonography of knee and doppler ultrasonography of vein of lower limb (procedure)

Thank you.